Nashi hopefully you are no contest
Na_nashi> this room is sposed to be humming
tom74> nashi think their wating on their leader lol
Na_nashi> np tom, I'm sure it's all being logged
tom74> u right np
VictoriaMV> what is the big deal about logs?
Na_nashi> lol
VictoriaMV> you make them Nashi
VictoriaMV> I make them
Na_nashi> Actually no
VictoriaMV> I'll bet tom does
Na_nashi> Well very rarely
VictoriaMV> I've seen logs you sent to me
tom74> no i dont need to do that and vic dont start chit with me
Na_nashi> It's a joke Vic
Na_nashi> Chill
VictoriaMV> why not tom? seems you don't mind starting stuff with everyone else
tom74> well y better learn to read then
VictoriaMV> I read perfectly well
Na_nashi> Logs actually have very little to do with anything
VictoriaMV> then why are you making it such a big deal?
Na_nashi> They are generally able to be authenticated
tom74> i just think its a big joke what space and his little boys and girls are trying to do
Na_nashi> And authenticated logs are evidence
Na_nashi> And evidence ..... well, what does that mean exactly?
Na_nashi> who is making it a big deal?
Na_nashi> I'm not
VictoriaMV> if you say so
tom74> he got banned fior 30 days right or wrong take it like a man
Na_nashi> Vic the only one using 'big deal' in the context of logs .... is you
Na_nashi> I am mentioning logs in teh context of kidding .... joking ....
VictoriaMV> personally I think the lot of us should have been gagged
tom74> ur right vic
VictoriaMV> not just a few
Na_nashi> You're probably right
Na_nashi> But I think that WGC sees the increase in activity in this room as a nett benefit
VictoriaMV> we were told that HH would read a weeks worth..
Na_nashi> And are prepared to overlook the odd --- sometimes *very* odd --- pecadillo
Na_nashi> In order for that to happen
VictoriaMV> she personally told me that all names would be taken out and eveyrone's comments judged and action taken
VictoriaMV> yet last monday rolled around and abolutely nothing.
Na_nashi> shrug
Na_nashi> Any issues with that, take it up with the person concerned
Na_nashi> Include logs to support your arguments, where approriate
VictoriaMV> I have never turned in a log
VictoriaMV> I make them.. when I feel they are needed.
tom74> well why if u will not play hearts and u loose fine comment but no need to do what was going on in spaces case
VictoriaMV> but not once have i used them \
VictoriaMV> I didn't understand your comment tom
tom74> ok fine
Na_nashi> Well, if logs are a valid recourse, adn you choose not to submit them ......
Na_nashi> .... then any action (or non-action) taknen in lieu of your failure to submit a log must be okay by you
Na_nashi> Heck I dunno
Na_nashi> Lot of stuff gets said
VictoriaMV> well in the case of last week, I was told that there was NO NEED.. that HH was going to go through the whole weeks worth of chat
Na_nashi> Not a lot of evidence gets produced to back it up
Na_nashi> Seems to me that authenticated logs would be a good source of evidence, buf feck all evidence is ever presented
tom74> well vic why go to hh
VictoriaMV> so what would you do in that situation.. when the person that says she will take care of it.. that she will read the logs of the site for a week
Na_nashi> Vic, I would say that any issues tyou have, you should take it up with the person concerned
Na_nashi> Like I did with you
VictoriaMV> I did NOT go to her tom.. she came to me
tom74> dont think so vic
VictoriaMV> I personally don't care what you think.
tom74> lol good
VictoriaMV> I dealt with the person I had issues with Nashi
VictoriaMV> and it wasn't YOU
Home 
